|
Hi,
<<IMHO an actor need not necessarily be an entity
outside the scope of the system - they may in fact be part of it.>>
Actors are the source of events to which the
system is being designed to react to. System/Actor goes
together in the same way that concave/convex goes together - one can't exist
without the other. To define the scope of the system under discussion (SuD)
you must describe its actors, or you simply don't have a system. Now
the scope of what is being modeled is important to consider. From the
perspective of one subordinate system, other subordinate systems are actors.
>From the perspective of the user of the superordinate system the subordinate
systems are internal system components.
-Richard
|
- (ROSE) Question About Actors Pankaj Chatterjee
- RE: (ROSE) Question About Actors Hugues Bernard
- RE: (ROSE) Question About Actors Flum, Michael
- RE: (ROSE) Question About Actors Crain, Anthony R.
- RE: (ROSE) Question About Actors Flum, Michael
- RE: (ROSE) Question About Actors Colin Gourlay
- RE: (ROSE) Question About Actors Richard Howlett
- RE: (ROSE) Question About Actors Couball, James
- RE: (ROSE) Question About Actors Couball, James
- RE: (ROSE) Question About Actors Crain, Anthony R.
- RE: (ROSE) Question About Actors mh188
- Re: (ROSE) Question About Actors Richard Howlett
- Re: (ROSE) Question About Actors Solange Appelbaum
- RE: (ROSE) Question About Actors Crain, Anthony R.
- Re: (ROSE) Question About Actors Solange Appelbaum
- Re: (ROSE) Question About Actors Dik van Leeuwen POP
