The "problem with sequence diagrams" was expressed in a messages posted
12/22/2000:
I have just upgrade to Rose 2001. It has just ruined my Model:
1. I am web modeling using stereotype icons, such as Server Page
2. I create and layout a sequence diagram using a class that has the Server
Page stereotype icon
3. I save the diagram in a cat attached to a Use case realization
4. I save model
5. I exit rose
6. I reload rose and open said diagram
7. Layout destroyed and Server Page stereotype icons are EXTREMELY LARGE!!
Please instruct on a resolution - I already have to redrawn every diagram
if I wish to work with them again.
-----Original Message-----
From: Patrick Kennedy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2001 7:45 PM
To: Steve Caswell; '[EMAIL PROTECTED] '
Subject: Re: FW: (ROSE) WE bought a copy of Rose and received 2001
Problem with properties is indeed fixed in patch.
http://www.rational.com/support/downloadcenter/upgrades/rose.jsp
Not sure of what the problem is with sequence diagrams...
"seems to be a problem with sequence diagrams"
It don't work, isn't much to go on.
Patrick Kennedy
Rational Support
On Feb 28, 7:23, Steve Caswell wrote:
> Subject: FW: (ROSE) WE bought a copy of Rose and received 2001
>
> I never saw a follow-up to the problems described below. Can someone from
> Rational please tell us the status of these issues. I would like to
upgrade
> to 2001 but these make me very nervous about doing so. I'm esp. interest
in
> knowing if the sequence diagram issue has been resolved.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Frank Dueber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, December 23, 2000 3:27 AM
> To: Patrick Kennedy; David Stockwell (Pragmatics);
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: (ROSE) WE bought a copy of Rose and received 2001
>
>
>
> Hello :)
>
> > version numbers are different, but important thing is petal version,
> > both petal 44. No new syntax was added to the file format for
> > 2001. So files should be compatible between 2000e and 2001.
>
> No, they aren't compatible. We opened a case at Rational support (CaseId:
> 649365). It's something as changed text at properties (e.g. using (value
> (value Text "hpp")) instead of (value "hpp")). So be careful using 2000e
> files at 2001. All our own property settings were scrambled! But Rational
> support is working on it.......
>
> And there seems to be a problem with sequence diagrams, too.
>
> Frank Dueber
>
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------
> CAT Computer Anwendung Technologie GmbH
> Niederlassung Wilnsdorf
> 57234 Wilnsdorf Tel.: ++49 2737 97008
> Germany eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Patrick Kennedy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "David Stockwell (Pragmatics)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, December 22, 2000 8:38 PM
> Subject: Re: (ROSE) WE bought a copy of Rose and received 2001
>
>
> >
> > version numbers are different, but important thing is petal version,
> > both petal 44. No new syntax was added to the file format for
> > 2001. So files should be compatible between 2000e and 2001.
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------
> > NT Unix Petal Format
> >
> > Rose 3.0 Rose 3.0 petal 37 3.0 Model
> > Rose 4.0 Rose 4.0 petal 40 4.0 Model
> > Rose 98, 98i Rose 98 petal 42 4.5/6.0 Model
> > Rose 98i SP1,2000 Rose 98i*,2000 petal 43 6.1/6.5 Model
> > Rose 2000e Rose 2000e petal 44 7.0 Model
> > Rose 2001 petal 44 7.1 Model
> >
> > *Rose 98i on Unix is named 6.0.xxxx BUT is actually 6.1 compatible.
> > i.e. If you go to SAVA AS menu and select 6.0, you will be saving
> > back to an older format.
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Patrick Kennedy
> > Rational Support
> >
> > On Dec 22, 14:13, David Stockwell (Pragmatics) wrote:
> > > Subject: (ROSE) WE bought a copy of Rose and received 2001
> > >
> > > Our development team is using 2000e. We just bought another copy of
the
> > software and received 2001
> > >
> > > Is rose compatible enough that we won't need to upgrade the rest of
the
> team
> > to 2001?
> > >
> > > Here is a petal file written by 2001:
> > >
> > > (object Petal
> > >
> > > version 44
> > >
> > > _written "Rose 7.1.9642.27"
> > >
> > > charSet 0)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Here is a petal file written by 2000e
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > (object Petal
> > >
> > > version 44
> > >
> > > _written "Rose 7.0.9420.17"
> > >
> > > charSet 0)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > As you can see the rose number is different. What other problems are
we
> > going to run into?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > David Stockwell
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > [ Attachment (text/x-html): 1196 bytes
> > > Character set: iso-8859-1
> > > Encoded with "quoted-printable" ]
> > >-- End of excerpt from David Stockwell (Pragmatics)
> >
> >
> > ************************************************************************
> > * Rose Forum is a public venue for ideas and discussions.
> > * For technical support, visit http://www.rational.com/support
> > *
> > * Admin.Subscription Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > * Archive of messages:
> http://www.rational.com/products/rose/usergroups/rose_forum.jtmpl
> > * Other Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > *
> > * To unsubscribe from the list, please send email
> > *
> > * To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > * Subject:<BLANK>
> > * Body: unsubscribe rose_forum
> > *
> >
*************************************************************************
> >
> >
>
> ************************************************************************
> * Rose Forum is a public venue for ideas and discussions.
> * For technical support, visit http://www.rational.com/support
> *
> * Admin.Subscription Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> * Archive of messages:
> http://www.rational.com/products/rose/usergroups/rose_forum.jtmpl
> * Other Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *
> * To unsubscribe from the list, please send email
> *
> * To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> * Subject:<BLANK>
> * Body: unsubscribe rose_forum
> *
> *************************************************************************
> ************************************************************************
> * Rose Forum is a public venue for ideas and discussions.
> * For technical support, visit http://www.rational.com/support
> *
> * Admin.Subscription Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> * Archive of messages:
http://www.rational.com/products/rose/usergroups/rose_forum.jtmpl
> * Other Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *
> * To unsubscribe from the list, please send email
> *
> * To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> * Subject:<BLANK>
> * Body: unsubscribe rose_forum
> *
> *************************************************************************
>-- End of excerpt from Steve Caswell
************************************************************************
* Rose Forum is a public venue for ideas and discussions.
* For technical support, visit http://www.rational.com/support
*
* Admin.Subscription Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Archive of messages:
http://www.rational.com/products/rose/usergroups/rose_forum.jtmpl
* Other Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To unsubscribe from the list, please send email
*
* To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Subject:<BLANK>
* Body: unsubscribe rose_forum
*
*************************************************************************
