Problem apparently has nothing to do with sequence diagrams. I skipped
step #2 below and still was able to reproduce the problem. Problem is
with Web stereotypes not saving correctly.
Just tried this with patch 1 version of 2001 and could not reproduce,
so this looks like it also fixed (however this is not listed in the
patch 1 readme as a fixed defect. Some other fixes do occassionally
slip in).
Patrick Kennedy
Rational Support
On Mar 2, 6:17, Steve Caswell wrote:
> Subject: FW: FW: (ROSE) WE bought a copy of Rose and received 2001
>
> The "problem with sequence diagrams" was expressed in a messages posted
> 12/22/2000:
>
> I have just upgrade to Rose 2001. It has just ruined my Model:
>
> 1. I am web modeling using stereotype icons, such as Server Page
> 2. I create and layout a sequenceServ diagram using a class that has the
Server
> Page stereotype icon
> 3. I save the diagram in a cat attached to a Use case realization
> 4. I save model
> 5. I exit rose
> 6. I reload rose and open said diagram
> 7. Layout destroyed and Server Page stereotype icons are EXTREMELY LARGE!!
>
> Please instruct on a resolution - I already have to redrawn every diagram
> if I wish to work with them again.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Patrick Kennedy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2001 7:45 PM
> To: Steve Caswell; '[EMAIL PROTECTED] '
> Subject: Re: FW: (ROSE) WE bought a copy of Rose and received 2001
>
>
> Problem with properties is indeed fixed in patch.
>
> http://www.rational.com/support/downloadcenter/upgrades/rose.jsp
>
> Not sure of what the problem is with sequence diagrams...
> "seems to be a problem with sequence diagrams"
> It don't work, isn't much to go on.
>
> Patrick Kennedy
> Rational Support
>
> On Feb 28, 7:23, Steve Caswell wrote:
> > Subject: FW: (ROSE) WE bought a copy of Rose and received 2001
> >
> > I never saw a follow-up to the problems described below. Can someone from
> > Rational please tell us the status of these issues. I would like to
> upgrade
> > to 2001 but these make me very nervous about doing so. I'm esp. interest
> in
> > knowing if the sequence diagram issue has been resolved.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Frank Dueber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Saturday, December 23, 2000 3:27 AM
> > To: Patrick Kennedy; David Stockwell (Pragmatics);
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: (ROSE) WE bought a copy of Rose and received 2001
> >
> >
> >
> > Hello :)
> >
> > > version numbers are different, but important thing is petal version,
> > > both petal 44. No new syntax was added to the file format for
> > > 2001. So files should be compatible between 2000e and 2001.
> >
> > No, they aren't compatible. We opened a case at Rational support (CaseId:
> > 649365). It's something as changed text at properties (e.g. using (value
> > (value Text "hpp")) instead of (value "hpp")). So be careful using 2000e
> > files at 2001. All our own property settings were scrambled! But Rational
> > support is working on it.......
> >
> > And there seems to be a problem with sequence diagrams, too.
> >
> > Frank Dueber
> >
> +--------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > CAT Computer Anwendung Technologie GmbH
> > Niederlassung Wilnsdorf
> > 57234 Wilnsdorf Tel.: ++49 2737 97008
> > Germany eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> +--------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Patrick Kennedy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "David Stockwell (Pragmatics)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Friday, December 22, 2000 8:38 PM
> > Subject: Re: (ROSE) WE bought a copy of Rose and received 2001
> >
> >
> > >
> > > version numbers are different, but important thing is petal version,
> > > both petal 44. No new syntax was added to the file format for
> > > 2001. So files should be compatible between 2000e and 2001.
> > >
> > > -------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > NT Unix Petal Format
> > >
> > > Rose 3.0 Rose 3.0 petal 37 3.0 Model
> > > Rose 4.0 Rose 4.0 petal 40 4.0 Model
> > > Rose 98, 98i Rose 98 petal 42 4.5/6.0 Model
> > > Rose 98i SP1,2000 Rose 98i*,2000 petal 43 6.1/6.5 Model
> > > Rose 2000e Rose 2000e petal 44 7.0 Model
> > > Rose 2001 petal 44 7.1 Model
> > >
> > > *Rose 98i on Unix is named 6.0.xxxx BUT is actually 6.1 compatible.
> > > i.e. If you go to SAVA AS menu and select 6.0, you will be saving
> > > back to an older format.
> > > -------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > Patrick Kennedy
> > > Rational Support
> > >
> > > On Dec 22, 14:13, David Stockwell (Pragmatics) wrote:
> > > > Subject: (ROSE) WE bought a copy of Rose and received 2001
> > > >
> > > > Our development team is using 2000e. We just bought another copy of
> the
> > > software and received 2001
> > > >
> > > > Is rose compatible enough that we won't need to upgrade the rest of
> the
> > team
> > > to 2001?
> > > >
> > > > Here is a petal file written by 2001:
> > > >
> > > > (object Petal
> > > >
> > > > version 44
> > > >
> > > > _written "Rose 7.1.9642.27"
> > > >
> > > > charSet 0)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Here is a petal file written by 2000e
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > (object Petal
> > > >
> > > > version 44
> > > >
> > > > _written "Rose 7.0.9420.17"
> > > >
> > > > charSet 0)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > As you can see the rose number is different. What other problems are
> we
> > > going to run into?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > David Stockwell
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > [ Attachment (text/x-html): 1196 bytes
> > > > Character set: iso-8859-1
> > > > Encoded with "quoted-printable" ]
> > > >-- End of excerpt from David Stockwell (Pragmatics)
> > >
> > >
> > > ************************************************************************
> > > * Rose Forum is a public venue for ideas and discussions.
> > > * For technical support, visit http://www.rational.com/support
> > > *
> > > * Admin.Subscription Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > * Archive of messages:
> > http://www.rational.com/products/rose/usergroups/rose_forum.jtmpl
> > > * Other Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > *
> > > * To unsubscribe from the list, please send email
> > > *
> > > * To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > * Subject:<BLANK>
> > > * Body: unsubscribe rose_forum
> > > *
> > >
> *************************************************************************
> > >
> > >
> >
> > ************************************************************************
> > * Rose Forum is a public venue for ideas and discussions.
> > * For technical support, visit http://www.rational.com/support
> > *
> > * Admin.Subscription Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > * Archive of messages:
> > http://www.rational.com/products/rose/usergroups/rose_forum.jtmpl
> > * Other Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > *
> > * To unsubscribe from the list, please send email
> > *
> > * To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > * Subject:<BLANK>
> > * Body: unsubscribe rose_forum
> > *
> > *************************************************************************
> > ************************************************************************
> > * Rose Forum is a public venue for ideas and discussions.
> > * For technical support, visit http://www.rational.com/support
> > *
> > * Admin.Subscription Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > * Archive of messages:
> http://www.rational.com/products/rose/usergroups/rose_forum.jtmpl
> > * Other Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > *
> > * To unsubscribe from the list, please send email
> > *
> > * To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > * Subject:<BLANK>
> > * Body: unsubscribe rose_forum
> > *
> > *************************************************************************
> >-- End of excerpt from Steve Caswell
>
> ************************************************************************
> * Rose Forum is a public venue for ideas and discussions.
> * For technical support, visit http://www.rational.com/support
> *
> * Admin.Subscription Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> * Archive of messages:
http://www.rational.com/products/rose/usergroups/rose_forum.jtmpl
> * Other Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *
> * To unsubscribe from the list, please send email
> *
> * To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> * Subject:<BLANK>
> * Body: unsubscribe rose_forum
> *
> *************************************************************************
>-- End of excerpt from Steve Caswell
************************************************************************
* Rose Forum is a public venue for ideas and discussions.
* For technical support, visit http://www.rational.com/support
*
* Admin.Subscription Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Archive of messages:
http://www.rational.com/products/rose/usergroups/rose_forum.jtmpl
* Other Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To unsubscribe from the list, please send email
*
* To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Subject:<BLANK>
* Body: unsubscribe rose_forum
*
*************************************************************************
