Hi all,
Currently I am using the model checker (RR 2001 Enterprise patch 1) to check
the consistency of my rose model. When I run this hundreds of errors coming
up in the log window all with the same pattern:
Error: Unresolved reference to Operation with name xxx
in Message yyy between <unnamed> and <unnamed>
in Collaboration Diagram: zzz
This errors are very confusing because the objects and all involved messages
between the objects are existing and used in a diagram. There was nothing
deleted or moved. After some investigation I found out the problem occurs
with all messages in sequence diagrams which are not operations.
Does someone know how to avoid this errors without creating operations? I
thought it is allowed on a analysis level to use messages (stimuli) which
are not designed as operations.
Thanks for your help
Michael
Michael Merg
Capco
T +49 69 9754 4342
F +49 69 9754 4921
Mobile +49 173 6633 041
e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
web www.capco.com <http://www.capco.com/>
************************************************************************
The information in this email is confidential and is intended solely
for the addressee(s).
Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not
an intended recipient, you must not read, use or disseminate the
information contained in the email.
Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual
sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be
the views of Capco.
http://www.capco.com
***********************************************************************
************************************************************************
* Rose Forum is a public venue for ideas and discussions.
* For technical support, visit http://www.rational.com/support
*
* Admin.Subscription Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Archive of messages:
http://www.rational.com/products/rose/usergroups/rose_forum.jtmpl
* Other Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To unsubscribe from the list, please send email
*
* To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Subject:<BLANK>
* Body: unsubscribe rose_forum
*
*************************************************************************
