Hi,
The linguistic engineers around here complain about the name artifact,
because "it is not an English word"... It should have been 'artefact' in
their opinion.
Is the word 'artifact' defined by Rational?
I am aware of the non-technical and non-Rose-specificness of this question.
Remco
R. van Veenendaal
Linguistic & Software Engineer
Polderland Language & Speech Technology
WWW: WWW.Polderland.Nl
@Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
@Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Very funny Scotty, now beam down my clothes!"
************************************************************************
* Rose Forum is a public venue for ideas and discussions.
* For technical support, visit http://www.rational.com/support
*
* Admin.Subscription Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Archive of messages:
http://www.rational.com/products/rose/usergroups/rose_forum.jtmpl
* Other Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To unsubscribe from the list, please send email
*
* To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Subject:<BLANK>
* Body: unsubscribe rose_forum
*
*************************************************************************
