Scott -
I generally give the component the same name as the class (within the
syntactic limits of the tools) whenever possible, because I've found such an
approach to aid in comprehension and manageability.
- Al
-----Original Message-----
From: Clemmons, Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 9:59 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: (ROSE) Physical component Naming convention
Hi,
I was wondering, what is the norm for naming components that map to classes
(i.e. in a component model)?
For example, if I have a class named
foobar
What would my physical component be named?
Foo Bar
foobar (the same)
Thanks,
Scott
:-> Change is inevitable except from vending machines.
************************************************************************
* Rose Forum is a public venue for ideas and discussions.
* For technical support, visit http://www.rational.com/support
*
* Admin.Subscription Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Archive of messages:
http://www.rational.com/products/rose/usergroups/rose_forum.jtmpl
* Other Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To unsubscribe from the list, please send email
*
* To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Subject:<BLANK>
* Body: unsubscribe rose_forum
*
*************************************************************************
************************************************************************
* Rose Forum is a public venue for ideas and discussions.
* For technical support, visit http://www.rational.com/support
*
* Admin.Subscription Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Archive of messages:
http://www.rational.com/products/rose/usergroups/rose_forum.jtmpl
* Other Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To unsubscribe from the list, please send email
*
* To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Subject:<BLANK>
* Body: unsubscribe rose_forum
*
*************************************************************************
