Is this true for any version of Rose? Mine is 2000e (build 7.0.9420.17) and unfortunately all I get when prefixing method name with '$' is a different name (regardless the method is a new or an existing one).
Thanks, Ricardo. > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Vance Christiaanse > Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 11:42 AM > To: Norris, Davyd > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: (ROSE) Static Methods > > > > Interesting! > > I wasn't able to make an existing method static by adding a '$' at the > beginning of its name, all I got was new name. > > But, indeed, a new method entered with an initial '$' was > underlined in > the class icon and the '$' was not part of the name. The > generated code > for the method did not include "static" until I updated the method > specification explicitly. So the '$' effects the icon but the > generated > code is based on the specification. That's what Davyd Norris > was trying > to tell me... > > "Norris, Davyd" wrote: > > > > Hi Vance, > > > > Rose does underline static operations, but you have to tell > it that the UML > > operation itself is static - to the best of my knowledge it > does not look at > > any of the code generation pages to figure it out. > > > > If you type the operation name starting with a '$' it will > underline it for > > you and set the operation to static. This notation is a > hangover from the > > old Booch days but is convenient since the UML has no simple textual > > representation to distinguish types vs. instances. > > > > There is the need for an enhancement though - there is > currently no way to > > do this via any of the properties pages. > > > > Regards, > > > > Dave. > > -- > > Davyd Norris - Consultant > > Regional Services Organisation (Asia Pacific) > > Rational Software > > Level 2, 459 Collins Street > > Melbourne, Vic 3000 > > Australia. > > Phone: +61 3 9613 9632 > > Fax : +61 3 9613 9699 > > HDesk: +61 2 9419 0111 > > -- > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Vance Christiaanse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Saturday, 10 November 2001 7:31 AM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: (ROSE) Concurrent Composite States Revisited > > > > > > > > > > > > Rose fans, > > > > > > I'm working on a list of "UML features that aren't > available in Rose". > > > So far, the list has only two items: > > > (1) Underline static operations in class diagrams. > > > (2) Tile a state icon into regions with dotted lines to indicate > > > concurrent composite states. > > > > > > A workaround to (1) was suggested by Netherwood Paul: use a > > > stereotype. > > > > > > As a workaround to (2) it seems that one could simply > leave out the > > > dotted lines. Rose doesn't allow more than one start > state in the same > > > context so a synchronization fork could be used instead. This > > > is similar > > > to figure 3-77 in the 1.4 spec except for the dotted lines. > > > > > > Vance > > > > > > Vance Christiaanse > > > Cintech Consulting > > > ************************************************************** > > > ********** > > > * Rose Forum is a public venue for ideas and discussions. > > > * For technical support, visit http://www.rational.com/support > > > * > > > * Admin.Subscription Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > * Archive of messages: > > > http://www.rational.com/support/usergroups/rose/rose_forum.jsp > > > * Other Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > * > > > * To unsubscribe from the list, please send email > > > * > > > * To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > * Subject:<BLANK> > > > * Body: unsubscribe rose_forum > > > * > > > ************************************************************** > > > *********** > > > > > > ************************************************************** > ********** > > * Rose Forum is a public venue for ideas and discussions. > > * For technical support, visit http://www.rational.com/support > > * > > * Admin.Subscription Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > * Archive of messages: http://www.rational.com/support/usergroups/rose/rose_forum.jsp > * Other Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > * > * To unsubscribe from the list, please send email > * > * To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > * Subject:<BLANK> > * Body: unsubscribe rose_forum > * > ************************************************************************* ************************************************************************ * Rose Forum is a public venue for ideas and discussions. * For technical support, visit http://www.rational.com/support * * Admin.Subscription Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Archive of messages: http://www.rational.com/support/usergroups/rose/rose_forum.jsp * Other Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * * To unsubscribe from the list, please send email * * To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Subject:<BLANK> * Body: unsubscribe rose_forum * ************************************************************************* ************************************************************************ * Rose Forum is a public venue for ideas and discussions. * For technical support, visit http://www.rational.com/support * * Admin.Subscription Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Archive of messages: http://www.rational.com/support/usergroups/rose/rose_forum.jsp * Other Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * * To unsubscribe from the list, please send email * * To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Subject:<BLANK> * Body: unsubscribe rose_forum * *************************************************************************
