Vishu,
I tried it but still don't get the method name underlined. Any other hint? Do I have to set any option in Rose? Thank you, Ricardo. > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Annamalai Viswanathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 12:06 PM > > To: Ricardo Giacomin > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: (ROSE) Static Methods > > > > > > Ricardo, > > > > In older versions of Rose this would still work but you would > > have to prefix the > > operation name with the '$' on a diagram and not in the browser. > > > > Vishu > > > > > > Ricardo Giacomin wrote: > > > > > Is this true for any version of Rose? Mine is 2000e (build > > 7.0.9420.17) and > > > unfortunately all I get when prefixing method name with '$' > > is a different > > > name (regardless the method is a new or an existing one). > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Ricardo. > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Vance > > Christiaanse > > > > Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 11:42 AM > > > > To: Norris, Davyd > > > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Subject: (ROSE) Static Methods > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Interesting! > > > > > > > > I wasn't able to make an existing method static by adding > > a '$' at the > > > > beginning of its name, all I got was new name. > > > > > > > > But, indeed, a new method entered with an initial '$' was > > > > underlined in > > > > the class icon and the '$' was not part of the name. The > > > > generated code > > > > for the method did not include "static" until I updated > the method > > > > specification explicitly. So the '$' effects the icon but the > > > > generated > > > > code is based on the specification. That's what Davyd Norris > > > > was trying > > > > to tell me... > > > > > > > > "Norris, Davyd" wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hi Vance, > > > > > > > > > > Rose does underline static operations, but you have to tell > > > > it that the UML > > > > > operation itself is static - to the best of my knowledge it > > > > does not look at > > > > > any of the code generation pages to figure it out. > > > > > > > > > > If you type the operation name starting with a '$' it will > > > > underline it for > > > > > you and set the operation to static. This notation is a > > > > hangover from the > > > > > old Booch days but is convenient since the UML has no > > simple textual > > > > > representation to distinguish types vs. instances. > > > > > > > > > > There is the need for an enhancement though - there is > > > > currently no way to > > > > > do this via any of the properties pages. > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > Dave. > > > > > -- > > > > > Davyd Norris - Consultant > > > > > Regional Services Organisation (Asia Pacific) > > > > > Rational Software > > > > > Level 2, 459 Collins Street > > > > > Melbourne, Vic 3000 > > > > > Australia. > > > > > Phone: +61 3 9613 9632 > > > > > Fax : +61 3 9613 9699 > > > > > HDesk: +61 2 9419 0111 > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > From: Vance Christiaanse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > > Sent: Saturday, 10 November 2001 7:31 AM > > > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > Subject: (ROSE) Concurrent Composite States Revisited > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rose fans, > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm working on a list of "UML features that aren't > > > > available in Rose". > > > > > > So far, the list has only two items: > > > > > > (1) Underline static operations in class diagrams. > > > > > > (2) Tile a state icon into regions with dotted lines > > to indicate > > > > > > concurrent composite states. > > > > > > > > > > > > A workaround to (1) was suggested by Netherwood Paul: use a > > > > > > stereotype. > > > > > > > > > > > > As a workaround to (2) it seems that one could simply > > > > leave out the > > > > > > dotted lines. Rose doesn't allow more than one start > > > > state in the same > > > > > > context so a synchronization fork could be used > instead. This > > > > > > is similar > > > > > > to figure 3-77 in the 1.4 spec except for the dotted lines. > > > > > > > > > > > > Vance > > > > > > > > > > > > Vance Christiaanse > > > > > > Cintech Consulting > > > > > > > ************************************************************** > > > > > > ********** > > > > > > * Rose Forum is a public venue for ideas and discussions. > > > > > > * For technical support, visit > http://www.rational.com/support > > > > > > * > > > > > > * Admin.Subscription Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > * Archive of messages: > > > > > > > http://www.rational.com/support/usergroups/rose/rose_forum.jsp > > > > > > * Other Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > * > > > > > > * To unsubscribe from the list, please send email > > > > > > * > > > > > > * To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > * Subject:<BLANK> > > > > > > * Body: unsubscribe rose_forum > > > > > > * > > > > > > > ************************************************************** > > > > > > *********** > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ************************************************************** > > > > ********** > > > > > * Rose Forum is a public venue for ideas and discussions. > > > > > * For technical support, visit http://www.rational.com/support > > > > > * > > > > > * Admin.Subscription Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > * Archive of messages: > > > http://www.rational.com/support/usergroups/rose/rose_forum.jsp > > > > * Other Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > * > > > > * To unsubscribe from the list, please send email > > > > * > > > > * To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > * Subject:<BLANK> > > > > * Body: unsubscribe rose_forum > > > > * > > > > > > ************************************************************** > > *********** > > > > > ************************************************************** > > ********** > > > * Rose Forum is a public venue for ideas and discussions. > > > * For technical support, visit http://www.rational.com/support > > > * > > > * Admin.Subscription Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > * Archive of messages: > > > http://www.rational.com/support/usergroups/rose/rose_forum.jsp > > > * Other Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > * > > > * To unsubscribe from the list, please send email > > > * > > > * To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > * Subject:<BLANK> > > > * Body: unsubscribe rose_forum > > > * > > > > > ************************************************************** > > *********** > > > > > > > > ************************************************************** > > ********** > > > * Rose Forum is a public venue for ideas and discussions. > > > * For technical support, visit http://www.rational.com/support > > > * > > > * Admin.Subscription Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > * Archive of messages: > http://www.rational.com/support/usergroups/rose/rose_forum.jsp > > * Other Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > * > > * To unsubscribe from the list, please send email > > * > > * To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > * Subject:<BLANK> > > * Body: unsubscribe rose_forum > > * > > > ************************************************************** > *********** > > -- > --- > Annamalai "Vishu" Viswanathan -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Rose Technical Support Engineer > Rational WW Customer Service > > We value your feedback and encourage you to respond to the Rational > Customer Service survey you may receive regarding this case. > > --- > ************************************************************************ * Rose Forum is a public venue for ideas and discussions. * For technical support, visit http://www.rational.com/support * * Admin.Subscription Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Archive of messages: http://www.rational.com/support/usergroups/rose/rose_forum.jsp * Other Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * * To unsubscribe from the list, please send email * * To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Subject:<BLANK> * Body: unsubscribe rose_forum * *************************************************************************
