(responding to Osvaldo Kotaro Takai)
> I think that you didn't understand Art's thought. > > If does Rose own a RUP's template, why to don't accommodate perfectly > its own concepts?. > > I think that Rational had to review the concepts to nullify suches > discrepancies clearly identified by Art. With respect, I think you didn't understand Jeff's objection. Not all Rose users always want RUP's 4+1 dogma imposed on them. The 4+1 Views and Use Case Driven dogma are doing a good job, and are fine in their place. And yes, it would be sensible if Rose were flexible and could support more than one set of top level views, so those using Rose with RUP and applying the dogma could have a tool that directly supports this world view. However, other developers have other world views, and don't want 4+1 imposed on them. Please don't take my use of the word 'dogma' in respect to RUP to be derogatory, it is not intended as such. Paul Oldfield any opinions expressed herein are not necessarily those of Mentors of Cally ************************************************************************ * Rose Forum is a public venue for ideas and discussions. * For technical support, visit http://www.rational.com/support * * Post or Reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Subscription Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Archive of messages: * http://www.rational.com/support/usergroups/rose/rose_forum.jsp * Other Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * * To unsubscribe from the list, please send email * To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Subject: <BLANK> * Body: unsubscribe rose_forum *************************************************************************
