Title: RE: (ROSE) How is Xor-association represented in Rose?

It means that the supertype is associated with Class A.  Subtypes X1 and X2 will inherit this relation.

********************************************************
R a t i o n a l
the software development company(tm)

Todd Dunnavant
Technical Lead, IBM End User Programs
Office Phone #:  (281) 431-8751
Fax Phone #:     (281) 431-8791
E-mail address:   [EMAIL PROTECTED] < mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Rational's Mission:  "To ensure the success of Customers who
depend on software development and deployment."
********************************************************



-----Original Message-----
From: Eric D. Tarkington [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 1:08 PM
To: Les Munday
Cc: Dunnavant, Todd; Frank Yang; E-mail
Subject: Re: (ROSE) How is Xor-association represented in Rose?


Les Munday wrote:
>
> What does it mean when I place an association from a Class A to
> a supertype X with subtypes X1 and X2?
>
> Does it mean that A <-> X1 XOR A<-> X2 ?
>
> If so, is this not a better notation?
>
> Les.

Clever, Les, but I think it means that the supertype is instantiated.
Association is a relationship between objects, hence the instantiation.

-Eric

Reply via email to