On Thursday 10 July 2003 10:51 am, Guillaume Laurent wrote: > Let's be honest, sforge works well enough 99% of the time.
Not at the moment. Why else why would I be bringing it up? AnonCVS has been screwed for a while now and won't be fixed until August at the earliest. There was no notice given on this that I was made aware of - that is just not acceptable. I'm wondering whether it wouldn't be prudent to take a "dump" of the entire Rosegarden tree (transactions and all) for not only backup purposes (to have our own copy of it all) but also to see if we can get it up and running somewhere else. Waving our hand at it and saying "oh, it'll be alright" is a nonsense considering how much attention we pay to the rest of the application. And can someone (either you or Chris) _please_ spend five mins on answering my observer question from earlier today? You guys might not be able to do any work on this stuff right now but I can - so help me out here. R ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Parasoft Error proof Web apps, automate testing & more. Download & eval WebKing and get a free book. www.parasoft.com/bulletproofapps _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
