Guillaume Laurent wrote: > you forgot to take care of the size of > the mmapped file, so you're memcpy()ing N times more data on it.
I certainly didn't forget. There is code in SegmentMmapper::refresh to handle that. It may be wrong or in the wrong place, but I didn't forget to write it. > I disabled it for the moment rather than fixing it because I have concerns > about this implementation of repeat segments. It has two limitations : it > can't handle infinite loops No such thing. A repeating segment always ends at the composition's end marker time. > and a change in the segment has to be updated on > all the copies. Yes, it's certainly slower. I thought it was probably better to do it this way (because it's so simple) unless and until it's shown to be too slow, but if you have a better way, go ahead. I can't complain too much, since evidently I got it wrong anyway. Chris ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
