On Saturday 06 September 2003 13:34, Chris Cannam wrote:
>
> One thing that puzzles me: You remember we had problems a while ago,
> when printing was first implemented, with parts of notes disappearing
> because they were being overlapped by other elements like flag pixmaps?
Yes.
> although it slowed things down hugely. Anyway the other day I got
> pissed off with the slowness and tried taking that flag out again, and
> it worked fine -- no glitches. Do you think that's just something to
> do with the version of Qt?
It's quite possible, after all the initial problem was a Qt bug as far as I
can tell.
> Should I do some more tests?
Can't hurt :-)
> Should I add
> the double-buffer thing back as an option? (I've been thinking I
> probably should.)
No. This would be totally obscure to a user, and essentially it's a choice
between buggy / non buggy behavior. If you need it to print correctly, then
leave it on (or perhaps hide it behind a 'draft' setting).
--
Guillaume.
http://www.telegraph-road.org
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Rosegarden-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - use the link below to unsubscribe
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
