Richard Bown wrote: > This is an excellent example of how one can talk down a feature that > one actually spent a lot of time getting just so.
Notation is never just so. It's possibly the most open-ended field I've ever written code for. If I wasn't prepared to accept the fact that there's always more to be done, I'd have gone mad long ago. That's not so much the case with other bits of the program, which are much easier to walk away from. Anyway, in this case the new Lilypond output is something I'm reasonably pleased with, and the notation quantizer is good code handling a very hard job -- it's just that it fails in a very particular way in the example I was talking about. And so I'd like to try to fix that, at some point. (The particular way is that it doesn't do a good job of telling the difference between the start of Stairway to Heaven and a slowly strummed chord.) You have a point, of course, and you're right. But this is a devel list, and I do think negative comments directed towards improving the software in ways that I can actually do something about are entirely permissible here. Chris ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
