On Monday 03 Nov 2003 4:52 pm, Guillaume Laurent wrote:
> On Monday 03 November 2003 17:42, Chris Cannam wrote:
> > I'm currently considering whether it's worth tying these together
> > into a single MIDI device management dialog
>
> Yeah, sure, but do we aim at stabilizing things for an upcoming
> release, or keep fiddling with the features 'til Hell freezes over
> ?

Was that a rhetorical question?

I'm suggesting doing both.  Most of this is not truly about features; 
these dialogs already exist, they just have a slightly different 
organisation.  The only exception is the controller dialog, which is 
not finished yet anyway.  And the device dialog has a few serious 
bugs left too.

The aim is to take what we have and make it work in a more intuitive 
way.  I don't know about you, but while things like simply not 
crashing are obviously concerns for the release for me, I'm also very 
concerned about some of the bits of GUI we've ended up with that 
aren't easy to use or particularly comprehensible.  I was trying to 
demo this thing to my sister yesterday, and it was rather mortifying 
how much work I had to go through just to record from a keyboard 
while a metronome played and then play back the result (on a 
synthesised oboe, per her request).  Think about what you have to do 
if the defaults come out wrong: go to the MIDI device dialog to set 
up a connection to the synth, then the MIDI bank dialog (not 
available from the above) to configure the synth as GM so you can 
select the oboe, then the metronome dialog (not available from either 
of the above) to make sure the metronome uses the right device, then 
the main configuration dialog (not available from any of the above -- 
and when you get there, choose a different page, then a different 
pane to get to the right option) to configure the record device, and 
then go back to the main window and select the instrument for your 
track.  It Doesn't Just Work (tm).

I realise that once it's configured, it (much of the time) stays that 
way.  That's why I don't particularly want to piss about with the way 
it works underneath.

Anyway, just a proposal.  I'm not doing any more work on it right now.


Chris



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive?  Does it
help you create better code?   SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU!  Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
_______________________________________________
Rosegarden-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - use the link below to unsubscribe
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel

Reply via email to