On Wednesday 14 Jul 2004 2:09 pm, Vladimir Savic wrote: > I'm able to use jack with rosegarden only if wavs are 1-2seconds > long (then I can use as much audio samples as I want), but if I > play only one single track with 1 min. sample that sounds useless, > buffer tweaking doesn't help at all!). To remind you that I test > all of this at 488MHz with 256MB's.
That's bad. You should be able to play longer samples on that sort of system, although probably not many! > Not to mention softsynths! Cann't play even one track of midi > through softsynth! :( If you mean separate soft synths like QSynth, then in theory this plugin system should be easier to run on a slow system because there's less context switching involved. That does depend on the efficiency of my implementation, which is still in the process of evolving somewhat. > Do you still plan this to be useful on 1GHz home boxes? Yes. I'm testing it continuously on my 800MHz/256MB Celeron laptop. If it doesn't work on that, it's no use. At the moment it's just about on the brink of being good enough. I'm still refining the audio performance for both samples and synths, and it's possible I might be able to commit some more stuff today that'll help with slower systems. Chris ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training. Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
