Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thursday 10 February 2005 22:40, William wrote: >> Is that because you delete your rosegarden directories after installation ? > > Yes. I've erased both directories. I have two ones, from CVS dated 01/19 and > 02/09 (yesterday). The former works OK, but the latter is like 1.0rc1: wrong > clefs, thin beams and print crashes.
I find it very useful to keep different RG trees for all of the major recent releases + cvs compiled and ready to use. Do you have enough disk space to keep Rosegarden source trees for 0.9.91rc3, 1.0rc1 and cvs all compiled ? > So, I guess that hash numbers after installing my currently built directories > don't help too much. No, unfortunately not. I really need the checksums for 1.0rc1 and 0.9.91rc3 because those are the versions you said you did and did not see the bugs, respectively. William ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
