On Friday 11 February 2005 07:20 am, Chris Cannam wrote: > 1.1, and bugfix releases for the 1.0 will probably be 1.0.x. That > said, if/when we reach a 2.0, I guess we might well have to reconsider > the 4-not-a-version-number thing and call it Rosegarden 5.0 to avoid > confusion with the old 2.0/2.1. (This is what happens when you try to
Well, maybe not. Debian, at least, calls the new one rosegarden4: ->apt-cache search rosegarden lilypond - A program for typesetting sheet music rosegarden - An integrated MIDI sequencer and musical notation editor rosegarden2 - An integrated MIDI sequencer and musical notation editor rosegarden4 - Music Editor and MIDI/Audio Sequencer Although it looks like there's a rosegarden2 now, and "rosegarden" may already be a meta package that will eventually point at rosegarden4 instead of rosegarden2. It's a pity you can't just relegate the old one to the annals of time once and for all, and get everyone to stop carrying it. Is there *any* good reason to use the old one over the new? Anything it could do that the remade RG can't? -- Michael McIntyre ---- Silvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621 http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Rue/5407/ http://rosegarden.sourceforge.net/tutorial/ ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
