On Sunday 15 May 2005 12:09, Chris Cannam wrote: > Guillaume -- sorry to be a bother when you've just applied this, but I > evidently hadn't reviewed it well before. Any chance you could revert?
*sigh*. Sorry, I thought this part was ok with you, I'll revert it. > There are also a couple of cases where the name of a parameter has been > removed from a function declaration in a base class with an empty > declaration body (intended to default to no activity if the subclass > doesn't override it). In these cases the parameter name must at least > be present in /* */, because, well, it's important. Yes, I already had underlined these, and I thought there was no such changes in sound/. Seems I didn't look well enough. -- Guillaume. http://www.telegraph-road.org ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes Want to be the first software developer in space? Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7393&alloc_id=16281&op=click _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
