On Monday 16 May 2005 01:45, Silvan wrote: > On Sunday 15 May 2005 02:51 pm, Guillaume Laurent wrote: > > You wouldn't have the same kind of permissions on the original files in > > your source tree by any chance ? And you wouldn't have a non-standard > > umask ? > > I guess if 0027 isn't standard, I do.
Indeed it's not, and that's the source of the problem. > > From what I've just checked, scons install files by copying them and > > duplicating the permission flags. > > This seems like a fragile design to me. I can't be the only person in the > world who changed his umask. To this kind of value on a personal machine ? It's a safe bet to say that not many people do :-). > That's what it's there for. This has never > been a problem in the past, and that's because the old fashioned build > system uses an install -m to set the permissions for everything explicitly. Indeed. Well, we can easily override scons' install method, but you'll probably want to reconsider that paranoid setting of yours :-). > gui/rosegardengui.h:25:20: config.h: No such file or directory *sigh*. Of course. Fixed in cvs. -- Guillaume. http://www.telegraph-road.org ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes Want to be the first software developer in space? Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7412&alloc_id=16344&op=click _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
