On Wednesday 18 May 2005 11:54, Guillaume Laurent wrote: > On Wednesday 18 May 2005 12:24, Chris Cannam wrote: > > > Translucency will have to be done at the X level. > > > > Oh nonsense. What a waste -- demanding translucency support at the > > toolkit or server level just for the sake of drawing one poxy > > little label. Honestly. > > Well, since it's there in all new distribs and Qt is about to support > it, we might as well take advantage of it.
We're looking for ways to make the previews work better _now_, not in a few years time. When exactly do you expect most of our users to be using Qt4 by? We haven't even begun to think about portability of our code to Qt4 yet! This is a question of usability we're talking about, not just an optional neat trick. Either it's worth doing now, or it's not. There's no point in saying "yes, it's worth doing, but let's leave it for a couple of years". If that's your view then you might as well say it's too hard and not worth the bother at all. And in that case, we're still looking for better ideas for what to do about the previews now. Chris ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes Want to be the first software developer in space? Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7412&alloc_id=16344&op=click _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
