On 5/18/05, Chris Cannam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Because of that faint advantage of XPMs, I think it's not worth the > bother to convert them into PNGs that are then going to remain exactly > the same as the original XPMs. It's absolutely worth the bother if we > can get PNGs with proper alpha transparency out of it -- that would be > great. And it's marginally worth the bother if there's even a vague > expectation that having icons in PNG form might make someone more > inclined to fix them for proper transparency later.
Excuse me my ignorance, but what is the problem about"true transparency" in current RG's icons? Alexandre ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes Want to be the first software developer in space? Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idt12&alloc_id344&op=click _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
