Peter Mogensen wrote: > Correct... But some decision needs to be made about in which direction > the notation capabilities of RG should develop. You could manage a lot > of the currently missing features like repeats and score-layout with > dialogues of options and segment properties. > That would give a nice WYSIWYG notation editor, but probaby be just as > powerful and easier to implement. >
Sorry... It should have read: "That would NOT give a nice WYSIWYG..." (and "probably") Peter ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions, and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
