On Saturday 04 November 2006 6:28 pm, Chris Cannam wrote: > Well, pure fixes might be better made in both (with the old tree for any > 1.4.1 bugfix release). But it doesn't have to be the same person who > ports the fixes across as who makes them in the first place.
Well, there is that. I should probably go do that, but then I am also coming back around to the same old problem with my event filter. It was copied from Cakewalk, and it could be so much better if it were tossed out the window and redesigned from the ground up to make more sense as a part of Rosegarden. Maybe I'll finally suck it up and do that for the next release, while I have to go fix it anyway. Anyway, I'm going to go fix some trivial things in the old tree and leave it up to one of you real programmers to go from there. > Yeah, agreed. It's a surprisingly big job though. I half think we ought to hold off on the bit by bit examination until I have a chance to think about redoing the menus again. I totally hate our menus. Things that seemed like a good idea two years ago have turned out to be utter bullshit in actual use. For the moment though I need to go finish working on a painting with my daughter. -- D. Michael McIntyre Author of Rosegarden Companion http://rosegarden.sourceforge.net/tutorial/ See my new music stand unfolding at http://users.adelphia.net/~silvan/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list Rosegarden-devel@lists.sourceforge.net - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
