On Monday 06 November 2006 3:38 pm, Guillaume Laurent wrote: > OK, I stand corrected. Glad to know that the guitar code is in a better > shape than I thought.
Yeah, just to reaffirm, we held it back for comparatively minor reasons, and because Stephen wanted us to. It's not fundamentally broken, and has a lot of potential to become interesting. It isn't fit for end user consumption yet either, and we've been instructed not to bother trying to clean up what's there, and hammer it in something usable, because it's going to be gutted and replaced with some amazing next big thing any day now. I'm inclined to agree with you when you say "the deciding factor is the amount of free time each of you has" though. I'm not impressed with this constant stream of "just as soon as X I'm going to do Y" coming from Stephen. Sure, we all have lives and all that, most of all me, but if the other guy actually means to do something more than talk about what he's going to do, then let him have at it, I say. -- D. Michael McIntyre Author of Rosegarden Companion http://rosegarden.sourceforge.net/tutorial/ See my new music stand unfolding at http://users.adelphia.net/~silvan/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list Rosegarden-devel@lists.sourceforge.net - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
