On Wednesday 06 December 2006 3:19 pm, Chris Cannam wrote: > I will try to find the time to make it optional -- I've always found > depdendencies on fftw libraries irritating in other projects because > there are so many different versions in most repositories. But you > know what a vague promise like that is worth...
Must you make it optional? I think we have too many options as it is. Having a Rosegarden capable of running in different states with different things turned off has really proved to be more of a burden than a boon. Let's just make the damn thing required and quit being such pansies about trying to be everything to everybody. I think we need to apply that more broadly in other ways too. Fewer options, fewer configurable behaviors. Avoid adding more of this, and perhaps we should well get rid of some of what we currently have. That's my vote. -- D. Michael McIntyre Author of Rosegarden Companion http://rosegarden.sourceforge.net/tutorial/ See my new music stand unfolding at http://users.adelphia.net/~silvan/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
