2007/6/22, Chris Cannam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Friday 22 June 2007 10:05, Heikki Johannes Junes wrote:
> Seems notes are in a triplet group, but they do not form a beamed group
> although they have a common beam.
I'm not sure what you mean there. They're in a group of type "tupled" --
a
group can only have one type. Rosegarden has also given them a (deduced)
Beamed property.
A rest in a triplet group
\times 2/3 { e8 r8 f8 }
may change the beaming of the triplet.
Also, the beaming in a triplet group may differ from beaming of the triplet
group,
\triplet 2/3 { e8 f8 [ g8 ] }
or
\triplet 2/3 { e8 [ f8 ] g8 }
The beaming in LilyPond export follows beamed groups and tupletting tuplet
groups.
Another error is that it seems like single notes are in their own note
> groups.
That's supposed to be legitimate in Rosegarden's representation, although
it
was perhaps a mistake to make it so as it does make things harder to
handle
sometimes.
Chris
Single notes may form groups, sometimes it may even be needed, but sometimes
it is necessary to remove the grouping of single notes. In LilyPond, for
example,
result of beam grouping single notes, like "e8 [ ]", differ from not
grouping them, like "e8".
--
Heikki
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Rosegarden-devel mailing list
[email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
