On 07/09/2007, Alexandre Prokoudine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just when I was going to ask, whether somebody is planning native VST > support using Jost's reverse engineered VST headers... :)
I don't know anything about those. Tell me more? I've only just learned (via http://www.ardour.org/node/1050) that someone reverse engineered some of the important bits of the VST protocol about a year ago, and the result is apparently available for use in LMMS. Is the thing you're talking about the same? I would be keen to have "native" VST (i.e. support for the plugins the Jost guys have ported to Linux, not using Wine) if clean reverse-engineered headers were available. But I absolutely haven't got the time and energy to do this myself. In any case, I don't want to get actively involved in any development using reverse-engineered headers because I've accepted the SDK licence terms and I don't want any legal troubles. If someone would like to provide a patch, that would always be very welcome. Chris ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
