On Tuesday 25 September 2007, Chris Cannam wrote: > Probably not something that should be committed before 1.6.0 is out, or > at least not to trunk. Perhaps we need a post-1.6.0 branch, or perhaps > we just need to get a bit more lively about actually sorting out 1.6.0. > I'm both still busy and not too well at the moment, so I'm not getting > a great deal done I'm afraid.
Let's do it the other way. Move 1.6.0 to a branch to finalize, and put the new patch in trunk/ which I think really should be the communal sandbox for ongoing work, unless the work is known to be substantially broken, like G's ongoing QT4 twiddling. I may get time to do my last promised bits of hackery this week. I'm trying to decide whether it would be best to jump back into normal life, or just take a little time while everybody can understand why I would. I'm losing money up the gazoo every day I sit here, but some things in life are more important, and money problems occur over a long timescale. Like health problems. The funeral went very, very badly. I always knew my uncle was a pompous asshole, but he really outdid himself. He gave a two hour sermon that could have been reduced to "I believe the woman we're supposed to be honoring here today is in Hell now, and I am too weak-minded and hopeless to bring myself to ever once do the appropriate thing." Fuck you. Uh, sorry for the digression. I'm still sifting through a lot of ashes in my head, but I'm getting over it. -- D. Michael McIntyre ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
