2007/10/11, Chris Cannam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On Wednesday 10 October 2007 21:07, Heikki Johannes Junes wrote:
> > I have created a new data type for fixed 'Bugs' which are not Rosegarden
> > bugs.
> > The new data type is called 'Fixes' and one may move there bugs which
> has
> > been 'fixed' independently to Rosegarden.
>
> I don't think this is a good idea, because I don't think anyone will
> actually
> look there. If Rosegarden hangs and the user cares enough to want to find
> out why, and the user has a bit of a clue, what are they going to do?
>
> * search for "hang" in the bug tracker?
>
> * read the FAQ?
>
> * search in the mailing list archives?
>
> Anything else? I don't think it's going to occur to anyone to check in a
> tracker category that doesn't normally exist for other projects.
>
> I think we should just leave it as it was (under Bugs), but perhaps add
> some
> loud text like FIX AVAILABLE to the summary line so people will notice it.
> And then add it to the FAQ. And when SuSE 10.2 is dead enough, close it.
>
> Chris
>
Ok, backing up the change.
--
Heikki
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
Rosegarden-devel mailing list
[email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
