On Friday 12 October 2007, Heikki Johannes Junes wrote: > To continue the discussion, I would like to say that it is not nice that > the bug repository contains reports which are of the > it-is-not-Rosegarden's-fault type.
I can agree with this. I think I closed the bug in question as "Invalid" ages ago, didn't I? Not our fault, not our bug, and it does get tiresome looking at it. > Better would be to collect distribution specific problems to the wiki, once > they have been solved in "Bugs" tracker. > Would that be a neat solution ? The problem with all such thinking is first people have to read it. We're lucky if we even get people to check for existing bugs or feature requests. Random first thing in the morning thought: I wonder if we could put something on the report bug menu with a list of issues like this. "Before you click, are you running blah, have you blah?" I don't know. I need to go back to bed, but instead I need to go work for 12 hours. Blah. -- D. Michael McIntyre ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
