On Monday 29 October 2007 21:59, Heikki Johannes Junes wrote: > 2007/10/29, D. Michael McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Yeah, it's the stuff raboofje did. Who is raboofje? I can't > > remember much about any of this, I'm afraid. Is raboofje Arnout?
Yes. > I filled the last missing gap [1], suggesting that the diatonic > transpose means "Transpose by interval..." function. That was the > last thing to document for this release. Next question: do we want to put either of the new startup dialogs (the "new version available" dialog or the "welcome" one) into 1.6.0? There is one good reason to push the "new version" dialog in as soon as possible, namely that it only really takes effect one release "behind" -- i.e. if it does go into 1.6.0, it won't be until 1.6.1 or whatever the next release is that it ever actually appears on anyone's screen, and if it doesn't go into 1.6.0, nobody will draw any advantage from it until at least two releases later. Reasons not to push it into 1.6.0: our download page needs an overhaul first; our welcome text isn't very good yet; it would add more strings to translate; we would probably want to merge the "package not found" dialogs if we were adding yet more new startup dialogs, which means more work; and if we don't do anything else to 1.6.0, we can get a pre1 tarball built (and start a formal string freeze) before the end of October, which is not exactly meeting our target but is slightly more satisfying than getting nothing at all out this month either. Chris ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
