On Tuesday 01 April 2008 02:47, D. Michael McIntyre wrote: > I'm not sure what this means, or what this target is even for, but it's > totally busted in both. The only really significant commit in the stable > branch has been Yves's new track header rework, so that must be what busted > this, but I don't see how off hand. >
Yes, it's my code, using a quite indirect way. I didn't detect it previously as I'd never compiled with the test flag on. The simplest fix is to link RosegardenTestDriver against the same four static libraries as the main rosegarden executable is. (Actually, RosegardenTestDriver is linked against only three among these four libraries.) Is there any reason not to do so ? Yves ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
