On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 06:22:25PM -0400, D. Michael McIntyre wrote: > On Thursday 03 April 2008, Yves Guillemot wrote: > > The simplest fix is to link RosegardenTestDriver against the same > > four static libraries as the main rosegarden executable is. > > > > Is there any reason not to do so ? > > Aucune idée. > > Arnout?
Basically because I couldn't convince cmake to do it that way, iirc > This test target is yours, isn't it? I added it, yes (it's a somewhat standard-ish cmake thing). > What is this all about anyway? it adds a 'make test' which performs some 'unit tests' (i.e., pieces of code that check that the library still behaves the way we expected it to, in order to catch some regressions). Mainly good for logic checks of course, not gui changes. Back then I wrote a bit about it at: http://rosegarden.wiki.sourceforge.net/UnitTesting Didn't really catch on though. Arnout ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
