Chris Cannam wrote:
> While I'm pointlessly rambling, I would note the irony of Matthew's
> original post complaining that we might switch away from KDE, while at
> the same time saying that he hadn't actually built Rosegarden because
> of its dependency on KDE.

Huh? I didn't /install Fedora's already built package/ (and I'm curious 
now *how* they managed to build it) because it wants to pull in a large 
chunk of KDE 4.1. As I already have KDE trunk, I'd rather not have a 
second copy that a: is almost entirely redundant, and b: if I'm lucky 
won't cause outright conflicts. The KDE dependency just means that I'd 
much prefer to roll it into my KDE build environment instead of 
installing a pre-built package.

So, if you'll pardon me, I think you missed a nuance or two :-).

-- 
Matthew
ENOWIT: .sig file for this machine not set up yet


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Rosegarden-devel mailing list
[email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel

Reply via email to