On Friday 09 January 2009, D. Michael McIntyre wrote: > the linking gets done, let alone how to look at the actual command that > must be running behind the pretty colors. I know it's all in here > somewhere, but the right search terms have thus far eluded me.
make VERBOSE=1 That helps to untangle how all of this works behind the scenes. It's a lot more complicated than I realized, actually, but it explains why I wasn't finding what I expected to see where I expected to see it. The CMake version sure does seem to be linking in 42 dozen kitchen sinks. I bet the rosegarden binary is frecking huge. Yeah it is. Check this out: -rwxr-xr-x 1 me me 303M Jan 9 10:11 RGbuild/rosegarden* That's not even a debug build, and it doesn't have the binary resources attached to it either. If I put all the -L or -l on separate lines, the CMake version is 134 lines, and our version is 17 lines. Which of the 117 is our culprit here? I see no obvious suspects at all, though I do have to say the level of complexity being carried out by the CMake version is really staggering. There seems to be a ton of boilerplate crap we need to prune out of this. None of which musing has really addressed the problem so far. Hrm. -- D. Michael McIntyre ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It is the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://p.sf.net/sfu/Xq1LFB _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
