Dear Graham,
You wrote:
> Should I change them all to say
> "Copyright 2000-2009 the Rosegarden development team" and
> send a patch for http://rosegardenmusic.com/resources/authors/
> (which is what the AUTHORS file says to look at)
> ? Or should I leave the copyright notices
> as being owned by the various people at the Center for
> Music Technology ? (listing their specific names, not
> CMT)
That is a good question. I know we debated the same thing as we revamped out
copyright information.
We have several people listed that were no longer contributed, could not be
contacted, etc. and we felt that it was easier to use the blanket terminology.
The people we could contact all agreed to the change.
For our sanity sake when we do updates, we would like a consistent copyright.
But I'm not certain that this is 100% uniform in Thorn. Michael and Chris C
will know better than me.
I see the notice in the pitch detector copyright as:
pitchtracker.h
-------------------
email : [email protected]
website : http://cmt.gla.ac.uk
copyright : (C) 2004 by D.McGilvray & CMT
I really don't know our position on this. But I thought I'd at least try to
address a bit of the rational behind the change.
Sincerely,
Julie S.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Return on Information:
Google Enterprise Search pays you back
Get the facts.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/google-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Rosegarden-devel mailing list
[email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
