Michael wrote: >On Saturday 12 December 2009, Graham Percival wrote: > >> I'm starting to prepare the glasgow-pitchtracker-2009 branch for merging, >> so I'm modifying all the new source files to match the existing format and >> style. > >When are you planning to merge?
Hmm... in 8 hours or so? Actually, I might as well wait for Nick's work, so call it 24-30 hours from now (if he's on time). And I wouldn't just merge stuff; I'll ask for review here first. But I'm basically finished my work. I need a few more hours to finish matching your code style, but that's it. >> Most of this is obvious, but I'm wondering what to do about the copyright >> notices. > >Using the same boilerplate copyright notice everywhere is the most convenient >approach, ... I changed that to \author >notes in the Doxygen comments in the class headers instead. Ok, will do. > Either way, yes, add them to the authors page. The source is in a module in > SVN called "website," or you can just send a patch and I'll deal with it. Attached. I don't think the pitch tracker is sufficiently large to warrant an entry to the main story. :) Cheers, - Graham
authors-index.patch
Description: Binary data
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Return on Information: Google Enterprise Search pays you back Get the facts. http://p.sf.net/sfu/google-dev2dev
_______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
