> ----- Original Message -----
>
>> From: Chris Cannam <can...@all-day-breakfast.com>
>>
>> If the patch I included there works for you, then it's better to do it
>> that way than to use scaled() which is potentially very slow.
>>
>
> I think Chris' patch is the way to go - if we're rewriting those pixmaps
> from scratch and aren't interested in the previous contents, we're wasting
> our time rescaling them, so looks to me as if just reassigning them to
> empty pixmaps of the right size as Chris' patch does is the superior
> solution.
FWIW, I agree it is. I was just looking at the local code and changing it
to the replacement for resize. I didn't see the larger situation.
> I hadn't fully grocked that those pixmaps are totally rewritten after the
> resize.
Tom Breton (Tehom)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Doing More with Less: The Next Generation Virtual Desktop
What are the key obstacles that have prevented many mid-market businesses
from deploying virtual desktops? How do next-generation virtual desktops
provide companies an easier-to-deploy, easier-to-manage and more affordable
virtual desktop model.http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51426474/
_______________________________________________
Rosegarden-devel mailing list
Rosegarden-devel@lists.sourceforge.net - use the link below to unsubscribe
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
