> I went to commit that and I saw you had already done the same, so all of > that became just one typo fix.
I winced when I read you were going to fix that. If we still had instant diffs by mail showing what who just committed, I wager it would have spared you the wasted effort. I really miss that useful feature that SourceForge 2.0 lacks. It strikes me as a good idea to cobble together a script to monitor the repository and post diffs to the bugs list whenever something changes. Hrm. I mean you _can_ click and go to the web browser thing to look at a diff, but obviously you don't do that either, or you would have seen that one of my translation related commits had the string updates. I confess I almost never follow through far enough to go clicking around to dig up the diffs myself. Very rarely. After many years of having them delivered to my front porch, having to go to the corner store to read them is like flying blind. -- D. Michael McIntyre ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds. Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list Rosegarden-devel@lists.sourceforge.net - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel