> I went to commit that and I saw you had already done the same, so all of
> that became just one typo fix.

I winced when I read you were going to fix that.  If we still had 
instant diffs by mail showing what who just committed, I wager it would 
have spared you the wasted effort.  I really miss that useful feature 
that SourceForge 2.0 lacks.

It strikes me as a good idea to cobble together a script to monitor the 
repository and post diffs to the bugs list whenever something changes.  Hrm.

I mean you _can_ click and go to the web browser thing to look at a 
diff, but obviously you don't do that either, or you would have seen 
that one of my translation related commits had the string updates.  I 
confess I almost never follow through far enough to go clicking around 
to dig up the diffs myself.  Very rarely.  After many years of having 
them delivered to my front porch, having to go to the corner store to 
read them is like flying blind.
-- 
D. Michael McIntyre

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics
Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics
Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds.
Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Rosegarden-devel mailing list
Rosegarden-devel@lists.sourceforge.net - use the link below to unsubscribe
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel

Reply via email to