Le samedi, juillet 20, 2013 à 11:26:16 PM, Tom Breton (Tehom) a écrit : >The options, as I see them: > * Leave it the way it is. I'd rather solve it then let it confuse >people, though. > * Remove that check. Then we'll always insert the exact number of steps >even if it's probably a mistake. > * Document it differently - yet again. Based on the "Oh, not again" I >just imagined coming from the direction of VA, probably not. > * Constrain the dialog: don't let "Use this many steps" exceed the number >of steps available. > >What do you think?
My preference would be to add a check box to remove or not the redundant events. But this is only because I like to control everything and be able to do exactly what I want, even if it is something stupid :) I presume that if a RG release is coming soon, the wisest thing to do is to leave it the way it is. Yves ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds. Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list Rosegarden-devel@lists.sourceforge.net - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
