On Thu, May 15, 2014, at 08:43 PM, Chris Cannam wrote: > On Thu, May 15, 2014, at 08:11 PM, Ted Felix wrote: > > Or does rg handle uncompressed .rg files properly? > > I'm pretty sure it did at one point (when using the KDE library stuff), > and it probably should...
... though if you get an uncompressed file but it still has a .rg extension, that is a bit weird. Not sure I'm convinced (from that bug report) that it is a server bug though. I would have interpreted those headers to mean the server sent a file of type application/x-gzip and then gzipped it again in transit (because it was gzipping everything), which would be inefficient but perfectly permissible. For it to be a server bug, the server would need to both mark it with content-encoding gzip and then *not* gzip it (instead passing the existing file verbatim). I don't see how you could know from that bug report whether that was happening or not. Chris ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ "Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos. Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free." http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list Rosegarden-devel@lists.sourceforge.net - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
