-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ronald F. Guilmette Sent: Monday, November 10, 2014 1:56 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [routing-wg] discussion about rogue database objects
In message <[email protected]>, Elvis Daniel Velea <[email protected]> wrote: >*Regarding the future process:** >* >I do not think it will be that easy to come up with a process. RPKI may >not be available for legacy (or independent) resources in all the >regions. I think this means the RIRs will first need to speed up the >deployment of RPKI for all the resources in their registries... ... Can anyone speak to this? What resources in what registries cannot currently be covered by RPKI? If the answer is "none", then there is no problem with requiring that right now, correct? ---------------- There are actually not only technical matters, but sort to say political, law, ... As about what resources currently can't be covered by RPKI - they had already been mentioned: legacy as an example. Regards, Vladislav
