Hi Gert, Unfortunately, our PDP doesn't have any definition of consensus (I was miss-recalling a reference to the relevant RFC about "rough consensus") and after re-reading again several times our PDP (RIPE-710).
However, in the discussion phase, it is explicitly called for "rough consensus", same in the following phases. What it is clear in any case, is that all the objections must be justified. According to that, I still think that having 10 or 100 (just an example) "no", only count if each one clearly justified (and not refuted by authors or the community), and is still consensus even if you have only a couple of "yes". Regards, Jordi @jordipalet El 26/2/20 18:13, "routing-wg en nombre de Gert Doering" <[email protected] en nombre de [email protected]> escribió: Hi, On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 08:47:31AM +0100, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via routing-wg wrote: > I can see also people in favor and I understand, as we usually do in any proposal discussion, that non-objection is consent. This assertion is not correct per RIPE PDP rules, except in last call. Gert Doering -- who happens to judge consensus every now and then. -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 ********************************************** IPv4 is over Are you ready for the new Internet ? http://www.theipv6company.com The IPv6 Company This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.
