Hi Job, I don't think I'm the one that should calculate that. However, if we have an alternative proposal with the SLURM file, it can be calculated (approximately) as part of the analysis impact that will be needed as well, right?
May be anyone from the community that already has done that job and integrated the SLURM in their routers, can provide an estimate cost, and then multiply it for the number of all the RIRs members? I believe (I may be wrong) that the AS0 is much cheaper to implement by RIPE NCC even if it is several thousand euros, than the number of worldwide folks that will need to use the SLURM in addition to RPKI (for non-AS0). Regards, Jordi @jordipalet El 3/3/20 19:23, "Job Snijders" <[email protected]> escribió: Hi Jordi, On Tue, Mar 3, 2020, at 19:20, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via routing-wg wrote: > I understand that, but I think it may be easy to get an idea, not exact cost. > > The reason why this is needed is because one of the arguments against > this proposal is about the cost. > > This can't be judged as a valid objection for reaching consensus if we > don't have that cost (approximate). Can you provide us with an estimate of the cost to the collective community if this proposal is *not* implemented as RPKI ROAs but just as SLURM file instead? Kind regards, Job ********************************************** IPv4 is over Are you ready for the new Internet ? http://www.theipv6company.com The IPv6 Company This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.
