Re: [routing-wg] 2019-08 Review Phase (RPKI ROAs for Unallocated and Unassigned RIPE NCC Address Space)

[Robert Kisteleki]

On 2020-03-04 08:23, Carlos Friaças via routing-wg wrote:

> Maybe the SLURM file trade-off is a good one (and it's availability
> seems inevitably positive), but if RPKI's takeup is slow, the SLURM file
> usage will be even slower... :-(

I'm more optimistic. If SLURM is the chosen path, then support for it
only need to materialise in RPKI software -- which I'm pretty sure it
will, since maintainers of said software know what they are doing and
they are generally responsive to user needs.

Robert