Hi all,

I must insist here. What is the balance between opposition and support, 
following RFC7282, for this specific proposal. Can we have a summary of the 
inputs?

I *could* (once we have the summary) agree that may be there is no consensus 
yet, but that is not a sufficient reason to withdraw a proposal.

Regards,
Jordi
@jordipalet
 
 

El 9/7/20 15:29, "routing-wg en nombre de Petrit Hasani" 
<[email protected] en nombre de [email protected]> escribió:

    Dear colleagues,

    The policy proposal 2019-08, "SLURM file for Unallocated and Unassigned 
RIPE NCC Address Space" has been withdrawn.

    This proposal aimed for the RIPE NCC to publish a SLURM file (Simplified 
Local Internet Number Resource Management with the RPKI), containing assertions 
with the origin “AS0” for all unallocated and unassigned address space under 
our control.

    The proposal is archived and can be found at:
    
https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/archived-policy-proposals/archive-policy-proposals/

    Reason for withdrawal:
    The WG Chair felt that raised concerns remained unaddressed and that there 
was a strong opposition against the proposal in the community.

    Kind regards,
    --
    Petrit Hasani
    Policy Officer
    RIPE NCC








**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.theipv6company.com
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or 
confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the 
individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, 
copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if 
partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be 
considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware 
that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this 
information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly 
prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the 
original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.





Reply via email to