Hello Jordi, RIPE-710 describes the appeals process.
Kind regards, Paul Hoogsteder. > Hi all, > > I must insist here. What is the balance between opposition and support, > following RFC7282, for this specific proposal. Can we have a summary of > the inputs? > > I *could* (once we have the summary) agree that may be there is no > consensus yet, but that is not a sufficient reason to withdraw a proposal. > > Regards, > Jordi > @jordipalet > > > > El 9/7/20 15:29, "routing-wg en nombre de Petrit Hasani" > <[email protected] en nombre de [email protected]> escribió: > > Dear colleagues, > > The policy proposal 2019-08, "SLURM file for Unallocated and > Unassigned RIPE NCC Address Space" has been withdrawn. > > This proposal aimed for the RIPE NCC to publish a SLURM file > (Simplified Local Internet Number Resource Management with the RPKI), > containing assertions with the origin âAS0â for all unallocated > and unassigned address space under our control. > > The proposal is archived and can be found at: > > https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/archived-policy-proposals/archive-policy-proposals/ > > Reason for withdrawal: > The WG Chair felt that raised concerns remained unaddressed and that > there was a strong opposition against the proposal in the community. > > Kind regards, > -- > Petrit Hasani > Policy Officer > RIPE NCC > > > > > > > > > ********************************************** > IPv4 is over > Are you ready for the new Internet ? > http://www.theipv6company.com > The IPv6 Company > > This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or > confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of > the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized > disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this > information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly > prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the > intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or > use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including > attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal > offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this > communication and delete it. > > > > > >
