All, First of all thanks to Petrit, the co-authors and all who have participated in the discussion around the proposal.
It is what it is. Too bad some voices are apparently heard more then others. Cheers, Melchior > Op 9 jul. 2020 om 16:33 heeft Massimiliano Stucchi <[email protected]> het > volgende geschreven: > > > Hi Jordi, > >>> On 09/07/2020 16:18, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via routing-wg wrote: >> The point is that without a clear summary of what was the discussion, this >> conclusion that the chairs are summarizing, is not obvious, and in that >> case, we two ways: >> 1) appeal >> 2) sending a new proposal > >> We can even do both of them. > > While of course we - as proposers - are not happy about the outcome, we > are not going to appeal nor send a new proposal, as the general feeling > is that there is no interest. We have tried with two different > approaches and it didn't work out, so it's better to focus on something > else. > > If you want to go on and make a similar, new proposal, feel free to do so. > > Ciao! > -- > Massimiliano Stucchi > MS16801-RIPE > Twitter/Telegram: @stucchimax
