Hello Jordi, in one way I agree with you, but seeing the history on this topic why not run some type of quick poll to check if people see value to continue on it or not:
/A: This proposal should be dropped (confirm the chair's intention)// / /B: There is a good intention behind the proposal, but no progress for the content - (stalled?) - are there volunteers to continue on it (if yes, please stand up)/ /C: Abstain to voice no opinion - but counts as active participant // / Something like this that it helps the chair to make the right choice. Regards, Kurt Am 09.07.20 um 16:26 schrieb JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via routing-wg: > Nobody said the same proposal. That's part of the reason a summary of the > points is important. > > I still believe it makes more sense the extend the discussion. > > Regards, > Jordi > @jordipalet > > > > El 9/7/20 16:21, "routing-wg en nombre de Gert Doering" > <[email protected] en nombre de [email protected]> escribió: > > Hi, > > On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 04:18:35PM +0200, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via > routing-wg wrote: > > 2) sending a new proposal > > > 2 is easier and faster probably. It is not a flooding, is a single > proposal. According the PDP there is no way the chairs can reject a proposal. > > Repeating the same proposal ad nauseam in the hope that it gets more > traction the second time, or that people will tire of repeating their > counterarguments again and again is misuse of the PDP. > > Gert Doering > -- NetMaster > -- > have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? > > SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael > Emmer > Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann > D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) > Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 > > > > ********************************************** > IPv4 is over > Are you ready for the new Internet ? > http://www.theipv6company.com > The IPv6 Company > > This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or > confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the > individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, > copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if > partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be > considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware > that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this > information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly > prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the > original sender to inform about this communication and delete it. > > > > >
